![]() It is episodically useful to that partner nation as well in deterring or interdicting violators of its fisheries laws, therefore helping to preserve an important natural resource and source of national income, which enhances its stability. Such a mission is individually useful to the United States in promoting a stable rules-based order at sea and in establishing itself as the “partner of choice” for that nation in an era of great power competition at sea. warship on a single occasion to provide that official a means of enforcing his nation’s fisheries laws. 3 An example of a tactical maritime security mission is carrying a law enforcement official from a partner nation aboard a U.S. The need for operational-level thinking and planning for MSOsĪ tactical action or mission is one aimed at accomplishing a single major or minor tactical objective. This section, after discussing foundational issues such as the nature of operations in the maritime security realm, summarizes the NPP and identifies inadequacies in the particular component of the process most impacted by planning for maritime security missions: mission analysis, as informed by staff estimates.ġ. 2 Navy planning is conducted in accordance with doctrine, specifically the Navy Planning Process (NPP). That planning is particularly essential at the operational level-namely, the level of command linking tactical missions with national strategic guidance. ![]() “Military planning is essential to everything that naval forces do.” 1 If the Navy intends to successfully conduct maritime security operations (MSOs), it needs to be able to effectively plan for them. ![]() ![]() Navy Doctrine on Planning for Maritime Security Operations is Inadequate ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |